“It is not in the least an artistic error that John should be an implausible character, a concoction of antithesis to the sphere in which he is placed, because any serious attempt to make him realistic would have broken the unity of the novel.” (Ibid.). Nor are the circumstances of his life normal or plausible. John the Savage is an abnormal and implausible character who does not seem to have been taken from real life. John may be regarded as an amusing character.

or informs Lenina that she an ‘impudent strumpet’, he is funny but not ludicrous or unlikeable.” (Ibid., p. When he replies to question on the telephone by saying, “If I do not usurp myself, I am’. The laughter which he sometimes arouses is never unsympathetic. Keith May is of the view that “John becomes a part of the comedy through various later incidents, such as his refusal of Lenina’s advances, and particularly through his Shakespearean diction. He is a part of the comedy embodied in the novel. John the Savage, a Comic Figureĭespite his strange position and pitiable predicament, the Savage has also been able to evoke laughter among the readers. John’s lot arouses pity in the reader’s heart. Fatherless, he has been brought up by a drunken, sporadically-loving mother who is hated and has been assaulted before his eyes by her neighbours, whose sexual activities have often taken place within his earshot, and who has filled his head with mythologies which conflict with those of the Reservation.” (Aldous Huxley, p. According to Keith May, “John … is so completely the antithesis of the scientifically conditioned members of society as to have had inflicted upon him what seems to be almost every category of psycho-pathological experience. John has to suffer much humiliation at the hands of various persons and society as well as because of the situation in which he is placed. It is this conflict between the two value systems that ultimately brings about his suicide.” (Huxley’s “Brave New World”, p. His old-fashioned beliefs about God and right and wrong (his beliefs closely duplicate Christian morality) contrast sharply with the values and beliefs of the citizens of the Brave New World. His beliefs and values are a curious mixture of Christian and heathen, of Jesus and Pookong, but, most important, he has a strict moral code. Gannon points out, “he acts as a bridge between the two cultures, and having known both ‘ways of life’ he is able to compare them and comment on them. He is the most important figure in the novel, because, as Paul W. John the Savage, is the central character in Brave New Worl d. Two Alternatives Before John the Savage.

Character analysis brave new world pdf